When you first watch the reimagined version of “The Crow,” the opening scene shows a white horse lying in a muddy field, wounded from being caught in barbed wire. This image serves as a metaphor without clear explanation. Director Rupert Sanders seems to prioritize style over substance throughout the film, sacrificing depth for aesthetic appeal.
Set in a contemporary Europe, the film is based on James O’Barr’s graphic novel, but it is heavily influenced by the 1994 adaptation starring Brandon Lee. Lee tragically passed away during the filming of the original “The Crow,” leaving a legacy that looms over this new iteration.
Bill Skarsgård takes on the role of Eric Draven, a man who returns from the dead to avenge his and his lover’s deaths in a supernatural, romantic revenge story. The screenplay, co-written by William Schneider and Zach Baylin, introduces elements of a Faustian bargain, blood oaths, and a divine guide in a unique twist.
The film’s first half sets the stage for a violent climax, with Eric and his love interest, Shelly, navigating a complex web of relationships and motivations. Despite some visually striking moments, the lack of chemistry between the lead characters hampers the emotional impact of their love story.
As the story unfolds, Eric embraces his role as the Crow, embarking on a mission of vengeance with a katana in hand. The film culminates in a dramatic showdown that pays homage to classic action sequences while adding a modern flair.
While the new adaptation of “The Crow” offers a more coherent narrative than its predecessor, it struggles to break free from the shadow of the original film. Drawing inspiration from various sources, the movie fails to carve out its own identity, resulting in a somewhat derivative experience.
Overall, “The Crow” is a visually engaging but ultimately flawed film that fails to fully escape the legacy of its predecessor. Like the wounded horse in the opening scene, it remains tethered to its past, unable to soar freely.